Games and Culture

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malaby, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Games and Culture, Vol. 2, No. 2, 95-113 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1555412007299434
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Beyond Play

A New Approach to Games

Thomas M. Malaby

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Games have intruded into popular, academic, and policy-maker awareness to an unprecedented level, and this creates new opportunities for advancing our understanding of the relationship of games to society. The author offers a new approach to games that stresses them as characterized by process. Games, the author argues, are domains of contrived contingency, capable of generating emergent practices and interpretations, and are intimately connected with everyday life to a degree heretofore poorly understood. This approach is both consistent with a range of existing social theory and avoids many of the limitations that have characterized much games scholarship to date, in particular its tendency toward unsustainable formalism and exceptionalism. Rather than seeing gaming as a subset of play, and therefore as an activity that is inherently separable, safe, and pleasurable, the author offers a pragmatic rethinking of games as social artifacts in their own right that are always in the process of becoming. This view both better accords with the experience of games by participants cross-culturally and bears the weight of the new questions being asked about games and about society.

Key Words: games • play • process • practice theory • contingency


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Games and CultureHome page
D. W. Simkins and C. Steinkuehler
Critical Ethical Reasoning and Role-Play
Games and Culture, July 1, 2008; 3(3-4): 333 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of Cultural StudiesHome page
D. Pargman and P. Jakobsson
Do you believe in magic? Computer games in everyday life
European Journal of Cultural Studies, May 1, 2008; 11(2): 225 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Games and CultureHome page
G. Calleja
Digital Game Involvement: A Conceptual Model
Games and Culture, July 1, 2007; 2(3): 236 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]