This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1555412009343571v1 4/4/340    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kücklich, J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Virtual Worlds and Their Discontents

Precarious Sovereignty, Governmentality, and the Ideology of Play

Mediadesign Hochschule Berlin, Germany, julian{at}kuecklich.de

In the following article, author argues that virtual worlds are characterized by a particular mode of governmentality. Rather than seeing virtual worlds as analogous to societies in the real world, he suggests regarding them as ‘‘social factories’’ in which the social fabric is inextricably shot through with economic production. While the governmentalization of the global economy and the concomitant economization of governments are processes that originate in the real world, they also result in a ‘‘naturalization’’ of virtual worlds, a tendency which also becomes obvious in the way virtual worlds are discussed in terms of ‘‘population’’ and ‘‘territory.’’ In virtual worlds, the suffusion of governance with economic production thus leads to the formation of precarious forms of governmentality, which are veiled by a pertinent ideology of play.

Key Words: virtual worlds • governmentality • population • territory • precarity

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Games and Culture, Vol. 4, No. 4, 340-352 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1555412009343571


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?